Being market-driven versus driving markets - what I understand from this in my context - you can create work to that of what the industry wants from you, or creating work that influences the industry.
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA112352672&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=fulltext&issn=0010194X&p=AONE&sw=w&authCount=1&isAnonymousEntry=true
Title:Little murders: thirty years ago, editorial illustration in our mainstream media was provocative and smart, driving the words as often as following them. Today much of it is literal and safe, more decorative than idea-driven. How did this happen in an age where image is everything?
I really like this article. Especially as my recent work is quite risque and pokes fun at serious topical subjects so would argue against this the title statement. Although it's an interesting statement and can still be related to what I'm looking at, what illustrators are driven by, why do they create the type of work that they do.
The Business of illustration
S Heller, T Fernandes - 1995 - Watson-Guptill
>I can't find a link for this or really know what kind of source it is but I think it'll be useful
http://www.manifestoproject.it/fuck-committees/
http://tomburtonwood.com/2009/05/tibor-kalman-fuck-committees/
the article from last year - v relevant
http://www.manifestoproject.it/fuck-committees/
http://tomburtonwood.com/2009/05/tibor-kalman-fuck-committees/
the article from last year - v relevant
No comments:
Post a Comment